LRS Grism 1 (300
l/mm, ~4.5 /pix, 4000-10500
) |
|
REGION |
PS |
GIF |
4000-6000  |
 |
 |
6000-8000  |
 |
 |
8000-10500  |
 |
 |
|
Bright lines |
 |
 |
|
IRAF
Compatible line list |
IRAF identify output
|
Nonlinear component of the
standard 5th order fit |
 |
|
Residuals after fitting a cubic
polynomial |
 |
|
Residuals after fitting a 5th
order polynomial |
 |
|
LRS Grism 2 (600
l/mm, ~2.0 /pix, 4300-7300
) |
|
REGION |
PS |
GIF |
4300-5500
 |
 |
 |
5500-7300  |
 |
 |
|
Bright lines |
 |
 |
|
IRAF
Compatible line list |
IRAF identify output
|
Nonlinear component of the
standard 5th order fit |
 |
|
Residuals after fitting a cubic
polynomial |
 |
|
Residuals after fitting a 5th
order polynomial |
 |
|
The previous line lists and plots were
generated in an iterative manner. Night sky lines were first
used to identify the bright lines in the HgCdZn and Ne spectra
independently. The HgCdZn and Ne plots were then added and the
previously identified lines were used to make further identifications.
A comparison with Keck LRIS line lists was then performed to
improve confidence in the identifications. We now believe all
plotted lines to be correct identifications, but some small uncertainty
remains in the far red end (>9000 A), so use these identifications
at your own risk. Feedback is always welcome.
We have determined the standard fit to be a 5th order Chebyshev
polynomial (6 coefficients). Though basically a standard polynomial
it is rumored that the Chebyshev form, in the presence of noise,
fits the underlying function more precisely. Though most spectrographs
do not show the red turn over we observe, we believe that this
is a consequence of the unusually large range of angles of light
exiting the grating.
Finally, all data represented below was acquired with the LRS
set to observe the highest resolution possible with a given grism.
We used the 0.5 arc-second pinholes illuminated by the comparison
lamps. This should give the user and idea of which lines are
likely to be blended. Only additive error effects were taken
into account in the data reduction. No flat fielding, illumination
correction, or photometric calibration was performed.
|