UT

 HOBBY EBERLY TELESCOPE    

SPECTRAL CALIBRATION SYSTEM     

 

LRS Grism 1 (300 l/mm, ~4.5 /pix, 4000-10500 )

 REGION

PS

GIF

 4000-6000

 6000-8000

 8000-10500

 Bright lines

IRAF Compatible line list  |  IRAF identify output


Residuals

Nonlinear component of the standard 5th order fit

Residuals after fitting a cubic polynomial

Residuals after fitting a 5th order polynomial

 

 


LRS Grism 2 (600 l/mm, ~2.0 /pix, 4300-7300 )

 REGION

PS

GIF

4300-5500

 5500-7300

 Bright lines

IRAF Compatible line list  |  IRAF identify output


Residuals

Nonlinear component of the standard 5th order fit

Residuals after fitting a cubic polynomial

Residuals after fitting a 5th order polynomial

 


The previous line lists and plots were generated in an iterative manner. Night sky lines were first used to identify the bright lines in the HgCdZn and Ne spectra independently. The HgCdZn and Ne plots were then added and the previously identified lines were used to make further identifications. A comparison with Keck LRIS line lists was then performed to improve confidence in the identifications. We now believe all plotted lines to be correct identifications, but some small uncertainty remains in the far red end (>9000 A), so use these identifications at your own risk. Feedback is always welcome.

We have determined the standard fit to be a 5th order Chebyshev polynomial (6 coefficients). Though basically a standard polynomial it is rumored that the Chebyshev form, in the presence of noise, fits the underlying function more precisely. Though most spectrographs do not show the red turn over we observe, we believe that this is a consequence of the unusually large range of angles of light exiting the grating.

Finally, all data represented below was acquired with the LRS set to observe the highest resolution possible with a given grism. We used the 0.5 arc-second pinholes illuminated by the comparison lamps. This should give the user and idea of which lines are likely to be blended. Only additive error effects were taken into account in the data reduction. No flat fielding, illumination correction, or photometric calibration was performed.

 
Courses | People | Program Information | Resources | Public Outreach | Weekly Seminar | Research

Facilities | People | Visitor Information | Observer Information | Public Outreach | Employment | Research

24 January 2001
UT Astronomy Program • The University of Texas at Austin • Austin, Texas 78712
prospective student inquiries to: studentinfo@astro.as.utexas.edu
web site comments to: www@www.as.utexas.edu