Syllabus | Classnotes 2 | Classnotes 3 | Classnotes 4 | Classnotes 5 | Classnotes 6 | Classnotes 7 | Classnotes 8

Classnotes 9 | Classnotes 10 | Classnotes 11 | Classnotes 12 | Classnotes 13 | Classnotes 14 | Classnotes 15 | Classnotes 16

Classnotes 17 | Classnotes 18




CLASSNOTES 18


The Distance Scale

These notes will supplement the text and the discussion in class.

In class, I shall describe the "distance pyramid" with the following building blocks:

  • Radar ranging within the solar system
  • Trigonometrical (Stellar) Parallax out to about 100pc
  • Spectroscopic Parallax
  • Cepheid Variables
  • Most luminous blue (or red) star in a galaxy
  • Supernovae
  • Most luminous galaxy in a cluster
  • Hubble's expansion of the Universe.

These methods are basically dependent on the earlier ones the pyramid. For example, distances obtained using Cepheid Variables exploit the Period-Luminosity relation . The P-L relation is established using a dozen or so Cepheids located in open clusters. Distances to such a cluster is found using the brightness of its main sequence stars and assumed luminosities of these stars (i.e., spectroscopic parallax). The latter are obtained from similar stars whose distances are measured using their trigonometric parallaxes. Finally, the method of trigonomical parallax is based on the AU which is determined by radar ranging.

We should expect the building blocks of the pyramid to change with time, as our understanding evolves, and to be in part a personal choice. A recent change is the use of the trigonometric parallax to determine distances to a few of the nearest galactic Cepheids. This is now possible -- just -- thanks to the Hipparcos satellite that measured trigonometric parallaxes from above the Earth's atmosphere.

Our list of distance indicators is not complete. Several other methods are in use. Here, I describe three:

 

The Tully-Fisher relation
(edited from Astronomy Today by Chaisson and McMillan)

An important alternative to standard candles was discovered in the 1970s, when astronomers found a clear correlation between the rotational speeds and the luminosities of spiral galaxies within a few tens of megaparsecs of the Milky Way. Because rotation speed is a measure of a galaxy's total mass, we should perhaps not be surprised that it related to luminosity -- the more mass a spiral galaxy has, the faster its disk rotates and the brighter it is. What is surprising is how tight the correlation is. The Tully-Fisher relation, as it is now known (after its discoverers), allows us to obtain a remarkably accurate estimate of a spiral galaxy's luminosity simply by observing how fast it rotates.

Comparing the galaxy's inferred luminosity brightness with its observed brightness then yields the distance.

To see how this method is used in practice, imagine we are looking edge-on at a distant spiral galaxy (the Milky Way, say, seen from far outside). Let's suppose we are observing one particular emission line. Radiation from the side of the galaxy where matter is generally approaching was blueshifted by the Doppler effect. Radiation from the other side (which is receding from us) is redshifted by a similar amount. The overall effect is that line radiation is "smeared out" or "broadened," by the galaxy's rotation. The faster the rotation, the greater the amount of broadening. Conversely, by measuring the amount of broadening, we can determine the galaxy's rotation speed. Once we know that, the Tully-Fisher relation tells us the galaxy's luminosity. As before, comparing the known absolute brightness (that is, the luminosity) with the measured apparent brightness allows us to determine the distance to the galaxy.

The particular line normally used in these studies actually lies in the radio part of the spectrum. It is the 21-m line of cold, neutral hydrogen in the galactic disk. It is used in preference to optical lines because (1) optical radiation is strongly absorbed by dust in the disk under study and (2) the 21-cm line is normally very narrow, making the broadening easier to observe. In addition, astronomers often use infrared, rather than optical, luminosities in the Tully-Fisher relation to avoid absorption problems caused by dust, both in our Galaxy and in others.

The Tully-Fisher relation is found using galaxies whose distances are known from Cepheid variables. Then, the relation may be used to get distances to more distant galaxies.

 

Planetary Nebulae
(edited from Exploration of the Universe by Morrison et al.)

The central stars of planetary nebulae are very bright in the ultraviolet part of the spectrum. The most luminous ones have total luminosities, including ultraviolet radiation, of 104 - 105 L. The ultraviolet light emitted by the central star is absorbed in the surrounding nebula, and such of it is re-emitted in the form of emission lines in the optically visible part of the spectrum, where it can be easily observed.

Planetary nebulae are easy to find in other galaxies. All one has to do is photograph the light of one of the emission lines. Ordinary stars will not emit strongly at this wavelength, and the planetary nebulae will therefore stand out from the background light of other stars.

Observations how that the number of planetaries in a galaxy depends on their intrinsic luminosity. Suppose you were to count all the planetaries in a galaxy whose distance you already know from a study of the Cepheids in it. If you then plot the number of planetaries that fall within each interval of luminosity, you will find that there will be relatively few very bright planetaries. You will also discover that the number of planetaries increases with decreasing brightness. What you have done is determined what is called a luminosity function for planetary nebulae. Furthermore, if you study planetaries in many galaxies, you will find that this luminosity function is the same for every galaxy.

All you have to do to determine a distance to a galaxy whose distance is not already known is to count the number of planetary nebulae as a function of apparent brightness. Since the luminosity function is the same in every galaxy, you can then determine the intrinsic luminosity of those planetaries by comparing your results with the known luminosity function. Since the apparent (brightness) and intrinsic luminosities are known, the distance can be calculated from the inverse square law for the propagation of light.

 

Surface Brightness Fluctuations

As Boy Scouts, we had to be able to estimate distances to an accuracy of 10% or better up to a distance of a mile or so. Our technique was based on the visual appearance of people. Up to a certain (small) distance, facial features are distinguishable. Beyond a certain (large) distance, it is difficult to separate persons in a crowd.

Astronomers have developed a method of measuring distances along similar lines. (The following is edited from Morrison et al.)

There is a particular type of galaxy called an elliptical galaxy, which contains mostly very old stars and very little gas or dust. A picture of an elliptical galaxy taken with perfect resolution would look much like that of a globular cluster, with many individual stars appearing as discrete points of light. Even with the blurring of the image caused by the Earth's atmosphere, the image of an elliptical galaxy does not appear to be perfectly smooth. Rather it is mottled or bumpy because of the lumpy distribution of the light emitted by the individual stars that belong to this galaxy. Furthermore, the amount of the bumpiness depends on the distance of the galaxy. For a nearby galaxy, the stars are more nearly well resolved, and the image has more bumps of varying brightness. For a very distant galaxy, the stars cannot be resolved at all, and the image will be smooth.

In order to estimate the distance of an elliptical galaxy, it is therefore necessary only to measure the degree of bumpiness in the distribution of light. This technique will not work for spiral galaxies, which contain large amounts of dust that also cause fluctuations in surface brightness.

 

Summary
The following table from Morrison et al. lists methods in current use (several of which we have not discussed) and comments on reliability and the distance range over which a method is useful.

 

 Method  Reliability Galaxy Type for Which Method is Useful Approximate Distance Range over Which Method is Useful
(millions of pc)
 Cepheids  Very  Spirals, irregulars  0-15
 Brightest stars  Moderate  Spirals, irregulars  0-50
 Planetary nebulae  Very  All  0-20
 Novae  Very  Sc, irregulars  0-50
 Globular Clusters  Moderate  All  0-50
 Surface brightness fluctuations  Very  Ellipticals  0-100
 Supernovae  Moderate  All  0-200
 21-cm line width (Tully-Fisher)  Very  Spirals, irregulars  0-25
 Total light of galaxies  Low  Spirals, irregulars  0-100
 Brightest galaxy in cluster  Very  Ellipticals in clusters of galaxies  20-4000
 Radial velocities  Very  All  100-4000

 


Syllabus | Classnotes 2 | Classnotes 3 | Classnotes 4 | Classnotes 5 | Classnotes 6 | Classnotes 7 | Classnotes 8

Classnotes 9 | Classnotes 10 | Classnotes 11 | Classnotes 12 | Classnotes 13 | Classnotes 14 | Classnotes 15 | Classnotes 16

Classnotes 17 | Classnotes 18